I've been following this repartee and have read all of your posts since your "We all know about Fowler". Later you stated...."My point was that people don’t see Nate’s value because they don’t know what to look for." However, I have not yet read specifically what you see as Nate's value (and I'm not contending that he has none). I respect your views (you've criticized mine in the past). Would you please educate me on what people don't see?