I find these two assessments QUITE interesting. At the time of his decommitment, before things were said about Butler dropping his offer, there were multiple people who assumed that he had simply blown up and was getting talked to by the "blue bloods" such as Duke or UNC etc and so he wanted to enjoy that attention and pursue "bigger and better" options. In addition to this, there were dozens of tweets posted on this board alone that said how great Caraher was and how Butler had gotten a huge steal to lock him up already. To my knowledge, butlerfan was the only one to say anything remotely negative about him and that was only to say that he "struggled stat wise" in one game but that he had played very well in the previous game. And as for the Pangos camp, you at the time said this... Mr. x, I agree with you about the rankings not being the true "top 75" player that people said, but as has been said many times before, if a sophomore commits, evaluators stop watching him and he ultimately drops in the rankings. I also watched him in the Phenom 80 camp in NC and thought his game looked excellent for being a 6-5 or 6-6 wing who was only a sophomore. Every review of that camp was in absolute agreement that he was a true basketball player and would thrive at Butler. I guess I'm just interested if this is just some negative light being shed on him bc hes no longer going to BU? Or do you actually believe that his game was never that good, but wanted to look at it positively bc he was going to BU? Thanks!